Legal Opinion

Tarpey v. McClure

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1923No. S. F. No. 10411PublishedCited by 73 opinions

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the respondents to receive and act upon a petition for the organization of a water storage district. Granted.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents to receive and act upon a petition for the organization of a water storage district under the California Water Storage District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 1727). It is submitted upon demurrer, the effect of which is to challenge the constitutionality of the act.

[1] It is urged that the act violates the provisions of section 24, article IV, of the constitution, in that it embraces more than one subject. It would be impracticable to attempt here to set forth even an outline of its comprehensive provisions. It must suffice to say that it…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API