Pullen v. Heyman Bros.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for fraud. The amount of the verdict was fixed by the jury at $23,491.55, no exemplary damages being assessed.
The plaintiff’s claim was based upon alleged fraudulent misrepresentations in relation to certain construction projects which the plaintiff and defendants had undertaken by reason of two agreements entered into in December of 1942, and certain other construction projects into which the profits of the original projects had been reinvested, which representations induced plaintiff to ratify such reinvestment and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Francis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Philbrick v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Rutherford v. Standard Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Aspen Pictures, Inc. v. Oceanic Steamship Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.