Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Standard Engineering Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1948No. Civ. 13770PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal by defendants Standard Engineering Corporation, a corporation, Leibert & Caletti, a copartnership, Jack Leibert, Carlo Caletti and Elmer Asbell, and cross-complainant Standard Engineering Corporation, from the whole of the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff and cross-defendant William G. Rutherford after verdict by a jury, wherein plaintiff was awarded $8,400 against defendants, and the cross-complainant failed to recover on the cross-complaint.

The action was consolidated for trial with two other eases, not identical, but similar in many respects in the pleadings, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Watson v. Commonwealth Insurance of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. MacK v. Hugh W. Comstock Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Haggerty v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API