Stromerson v. Averill
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Plaintiffs, H. C. Stromerson and his wife, brought this action to quiet title to a 562-aere tract which was being purchased under contract from Miller & Lux, Inc. in Stromerson’s name. Defendant Averill alleged in his answer that Stromerson acted as his agent in making the contract to purchase the land, denied plaintiffs had any interest therein and prayed that title be quieted in him. The court found in accordance with the allegations in defendant’s answer and plaintiffs appealed from the judgment for defendant. For the purposes of clarity and brevity H. C. Stromerson will be treated here as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Buhne v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Billings v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Harding v. HardingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.