Legal Opinion

Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1944No. L. A. 19013PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

A jury awarded Jane Mazzotta damages for personal injuries sustained by her as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by Samuel Pinkelstein and a motorbus operated by Los Angeles Bailway Corporation. Both Pinkelstein and the corporation moved for a new trial upon all of the statutory grounds. Each motion was granted, that of the corporation because of errors of law and also upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The ruling in favor of Pinkelstein was based upon certain instructions which the court declared were erroneous, and the appeal is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Brown v. George Pepperdine FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API