Legal Opinion
DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 23, 2007No. AC 27337PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The issue in this appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) is whether there was sufficient evidence before the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) for him to find that the death of the decedent, James DiNuzzo, was causally related to a compensable injury. We conclude that there were insufficient subordinate facts before the commissioner from which he reasonably could make such a finding and, thus, reverse the decision of the board.
On appeal, the defendant Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc., 1 claims that the board improperly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Blakeslee v. PLATT BROS. AND CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Dengler v. Special Attention Health Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Labadie v. Norwalk Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Card v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. PelosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hummel v. Marten Transport, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Sellers v. Sellers Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.