Legal Opinion
Aspiazu v. Orgera
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 29, 1987No. 13125PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff, Carlos Aspiazu, brought this action for damages against the defendant, Mario Orgera, alleging an intentional assault and/or a negligent contact. The jury found for the plaintiff on the intentional assault count and awarded $28,000 in damages. The defendant has appealed to this court, alleging that the trial court improperly admitted a medical report and that the court erred in its instruction to the jury regarding unemployment compensation benefits awardéd to the plaintiff. We find no error.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The plaintiff had worked for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Zuchowicz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. NunesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.