Legal Opinion
Card v. State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 2000No. AC 18555PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Mary L. Card, appeals from the trial court’s judgment setting aside a jury verdict that had been returned in her favor. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the court improperly ruled that an expert witness’ opinion on apportionment of damages should have been excluded as speculative and (2) even if the expert testimony should have been excluded, the verdict should stand because the defendant is jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BorrelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Pantanella v. Enfield Ford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.