Legal Opinion
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 5, 2008No. AC 28146PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendants, Prometheus Pharmacy and CNA Risk Services, Inc., appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the finding and award of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) in favor of the plaintiff, Susan Marandino, and dismissing the defendants’ appeal. The defendants claim that the board (1) improperly sustained the commissioner’s finding that the plaintiffs knee injury causally was related to her master right elbow injury and, as such, was compen-sable, and (2) improperly sustained the commissioner’s finding that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. FarnumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Murchison v. Skinner Precision Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Birnie v. Electric Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Bode v. Connecticut Mason Contractors, the Learning CorridorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.