Legal Opinion
Hummel v. Marten Transport, Ltd.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 9, 2009No. 28813, 30000PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
In this workers’ compensation matter, the defendants, Marten Transport, Ltd. (Marten), and its insurer, Crawford & Company, appeal from the decisions of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the workers’ compensation commissioner’s (1) finding of compensability, (2) award of a penalty pursuant to General Statutes § 31-303 and (3) refusal to reduce the award to the plaintiff, Debra Hummel, by the amount of social security widow’s benefits she receives. We affirm the decisions of the board.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the issues…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Enquist v. General DatacomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. Connecticut Children's Medical Center Faculty Practice PlanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Voronuk v. Electric Boat Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Buchanan v. East HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Sierra v. C & S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Dahle v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.