Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Leonhardt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1997No. OSB 94-36; SC S41228PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused, a former District Attorney of Clatsop County, guilty of multiple violations of statutes and disciplinary rules. The trial panel determined that the appropriate sanction is disbarment. That determination made the trial panel decision subj ect to mandatory review by this court. ORS 9.536(2); BR 10.1. 1 On review, we find the accused guilty of acts that require her disbarment.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

We find the following facts to have been proved by clear and convincing evidence:

The accused was a deputy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpiesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KirkmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API