Legal Opinion

State v. Wiborg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 2017No. M19635, M19663; A156084 (Control), A156085PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J. pro tempore

In this consolidated criminal case, defendant appeals from judgments of conviction for improper use of the emergency communications system, ORS 165.570.1 His convictions arise from two incidents in which defendant called 9-1-1 to report his belief that prowlers had entered his property. On appeal, the dispute turns on how to construe the culpable mental state requirement of ORS 165.570, which makes it a crime for a person to “knowingly” make an emergency call “for a purpose other than to report a situation that the person reasonably believes requires prompt service in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SimonovOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RainoldiOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BarboeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ColbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. Quintin C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. OldfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. OldfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API