Smith v. Blodget
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
From the following facts the present litigation arose: Plaintiffs were the owners of certain land in Kern County, California, and desired to dispose of the same. In June, 1918, plaintiff Frank H. Smith, Sr., held a conversation with defendants R. B. Blodget and T. E. Commins, dealers in real estate, wherein defendant Blodget stated that the Associated Oil Company was interested in purchasing a thousand contiguous acres in said county at $150 an acre and that plaintiffs’ land was in the contemplated area. The necessity of securing united action on the part of the several owners of the land in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- De Vries v. BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.