Legal Opinion

Revert v. Hesse

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1920No. L. A. No. 6040PublishedCited by 68 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Action for damages for fraudulent conversion in securing the possession of and releasing of record two mortgages on premises consisting of eighty acres of land in Imperial County, California.

The motion to dismiss this appeal, which was made upon the ground that appellants’ notice to the clerk to prepare a transcript was not filed within the time prescribed by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, is without merit. In the cases relied upon by respondent in support of the motion there was no transcript on file in the supreme court, either for the reason that no transcript was prepared…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Jernigan v. WainerTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Brumley v. Chattanooga Speedway & Motordrome Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hyden's Administrator v. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Mox Incorporated v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API