Legal Opinion

De Vries v. Brumback

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1960No. S. F. 20331PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

On February 18, 1955, plaintiff’s assignor, a San Francisco jewelry firm, was robbed of certain money, precious stones and jewelry. Thereafter, in this action for conversion, plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant James J. Brumback for $21,947.13, the value of the property that was taken in the robbery and was not subsequently recovered. Defendant Brumback appeals on the judgment roll, contending that the findings do not support the judgment.

The pertinent findings of fact are: “V. On the 18th day of February, 1955, Paul de Vries, Inc., a jewelry firm, owned and had in its possession…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. WeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Wheelright v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API