Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1892No. 13619PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs executed to the defendant the following instrument: —
“We hereby authorize Easton & Eldridge, for us, and within five days from date hereof, and until this authority is canceled in writing by us, to sell for the sum of $10,000—net dollars—the following described property situated in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, to wit: ‘ All of block 935, outside lands; and we will pay said Easton & Eldridge a commission of all over said sum of $10,000, net, for which they may sell said property with our consent/
“ Witness our hand and seal this twenty-fourth day of…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Smith v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tufts v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.