Legal Opinion

State v. MEDINGER

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 2010No. 090617FE, 090618FE A142025 (Control), A142026PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence obtained after a police officer stopped defendant and drove him to the scene of a crime. ORS 137.060(l)(c). The trial court concluded that the officer had arrested defendant without probable cause, and rejected the state’s inevitable discovery argument. We affirm.

We take the following facts from the trial court record and the trial court’s findings. See State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993) (“A trial court’s findings of historical fact are binding on appellate courts if there is constitutionally sufficient evidence in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. GresselOregon Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HebrardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. AyvazovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API