Legal Opinion

State v. Steele

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 2018No. A160415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

*677Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, entered after a conditional guilty plea, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress methamphetamine evidence that was seized following his arrest. The trial court concluded that, although the search and seizure was not lawfully incident to defendant's arrest for harassment, the evidence was nevertheless admissible because it inevitably would have been discovered during the booking process conducted in accordance with the jail's inventory policy. Defendant argues that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. LoraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Garnett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  4. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API