Legal Opinion
State v. Ehly
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1993No. CC 89-CR-0958-TM; CA A63346; SC S38790PublishedCited by 619 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), and for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that police officers seized after they responded to a call for assistance from a motel manager. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Ehly, 109 Or App 456, 819 P2d 1386 (1991). We also affirm on different grounds.
Evert, the manager of a motel in Bend, became concerned when defendant failed to check out of a motel room by the scheduled noon…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by619 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
614 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.