Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1984No. CA A22274; SC S30071PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3PETERSON, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether a police inventory of the contents of an impounded automobile without a search warrant violated defendant’s right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures as guaranteed by the state and federal constitutions.1

I

A person called the police during early morning hours to report a man acting suspiciously in the neighborhood. The police patrolled the neighborhood and found an unattended car the suspect may have been driving. With some police remaining at the car, others continued to check the area in an attempt to find the suspect. In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API