Legal Opinion

State v. Gressel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1976PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*335HOLMAN, J.

Defendant was indicted for criminal activity in drugs by possession on his person of 1.8 ounces of marijuana. Prior to trial he filed a motion to suppress the seized marijuana on the ground that the police officer did not have probable cause to search him. This motion was denied. Defendant then stipulated to certain facts, waived trial by jury, and was found guilty as charged by the trial court. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. 24 Or App 525, 546 P2d 478 (1976). We granted review to determine if the motion to suppress was correctly denied.

The pertinent facts are as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. GrodaOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. Vasquez-VillagomezOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. VerdineOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API