Legal Opinion

State v. Ayvazov

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 2011No. 090130110; A143783PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

As in State v. Rayburn, 246 Or App 486, 266 P3d 156 (2011), the state appeals from an order suppressing incriminating statements and other evidence obtained after defendant was arrested for unauthorized use of a vehicle. ORS 164.135(l)(a). The trial court agreed with defendant that the arrest was unlawful because one element of that crime is knowledge that the use is, in fact, unauthorized, and the arresting officers did not have probable cause to believe that defendant had such knowledge. In a cross-assignment of error, defendant contends that the evidence was correctly suppressed because he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Vasquez-VillagomezOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. WerowinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. Huerta-ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API