Legal Opinion

Gas Tool Patents Corporation v. Mould

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 1943No. 8011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action for specific performance of a contract pertaining to inventions and patents relating to gas hammers. By its action, appellant sought disclosure of all inventions and improvements made by appellee in the field; the transfer and assignment of all such inventions and patents to appellant; an injunction to prevent further violation of the contract relied upon; and an accounting of all damages and profits resulting from the acts complained of.

The contract sued upon was executed in 1927, following a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  2. Reece Folding Mach. Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
  3. Mullins Mfg. Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  3. University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. New Britain Machine Co. v. YeoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  5. Dorr-Oliver, Incorporated v. The United States, Comanco, Incorporated and Lockheed Aircraft, Incorporated, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API