Legal Opinion
Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 27, 1964No. Civ. A. 62 C 1434, 62 C 1436, 62 C 1921PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action originally brought as three separate actions which were consolidated for trial. Plaintiffs allege infringement of two patents, Nos. 2,395,449 and 2,919,807, granted respectively on February 26, 1946, and January 5, 1960, in the name of Southwick W. Briggs, one of the plaintiffs. Patent No. 2,395,449 expired on February 26, 1963; patent No. 2,919,807 is still in force. Plaintiffs specifically allege infringement of claims 9, 10,11, and 12 of patent No. 2,395,449 (hereinafter abbreviated to ’449) and claims 4, 6, 8, 9, 10…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Baker Manufacturing Company v. Whitewater Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- MacIe v. Clark Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.