Legal Opinion

Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 29, 1934No. 5105PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Appellant was employed by appellee in the year’ 1927 as a chemical engineer at a salary of $150 per month, whieh wage was thereafter increased from time to time until it reached $225 per month. His employment terminated in June, 1930. His work was in appellee’s research laboratory. His assignment was to solve the problem presented by the laminating or tearing of paper tape when being unwound from the roll or removed from the surface to which it was adhered and also to endeavor to reduce the cost of adhesive tape manufacture.

Appellee for many years had been…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Railroad Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Aspinwall, Manuf'g Co. v. GillUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. United Lens Corporation v. Doray Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Robert SharfsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API