Legal Opinion
University Patents, Inc. v. Kligman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-3525, 90-0422PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (the University) and University Patents, Inc. (UPI), commenced this action to recover royalties allegedly owed to them by defendants for a preparation for photoaged skin invented by Dr. Klig-man and marketed under license by Johnson & Johnson (J & J), and to seek a declaration of ownership in the patent rights to this product..Presently before the court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment premised on the absence of any demonstrated enforceable rights of plaintiffs in Dr. Klig-man’s discovery.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Childers v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Seal v. Riverside Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Preston v. Marathon Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.