Dorr-Oliver, Incorporated v. The United States, Comanco, Incorporated and Lockheed Aircraft, Incorporated, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner James F. Davis with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report, on the issue as to when plaintiff became the “owner” of the patent, within the meaning of § 1498 of 28 U.S. C„ filed May 7, 1970. On June 1, 1970 defendant filed a notice of intention to except to the commissioner’s report. However, on August 18, 1970, there were filed defendant’s withdrawal of its notice of intention to except, a joint motion of…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Nutt v. KnutSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Pittman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Reece Folding Mach. Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Filmtec Corporation v. HydranauticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- In Re MedinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.