Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1DissentMoore, J.

The bill of complaint is filed in this case to compel defendant to assign to plaintiff certain patents. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill asking for affirmative relief. The bill of complaint was dismissed and a decree granting the relief prayed in the cross-bill was granted. The case is brought into this court by the plaintiff on appeal.

The bill of complaint was filed April 4, 1923. The plaintiff company was organized August 23, 1915. It succeeded Mr. Clark W. Parker who was made its first president. We quote some correspondence that is important:

“(Letter from Clark W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire-Insurance v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Detroit Testing Laboratory v. RobisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Development Co. v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Gas Tool Patents Corporation v. MouldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Mainland Industries, Inc. v. Timberland MacHines & Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Velsicol Corp. v. HymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API