Legal Opinion

Braley v. Empire Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1933No. Docket No. 833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In January, 1906, the Empire Investment Company, hereinafter called the Land Company, owned some 18,000 acres lying on both sides of the Kings River and riparian thereto, which it desired to subdivide and sell. The Land Company also owned 8% shares of stock in the Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Company, hereinafter called the Canal Company, these shares entitling the owner to certain water in addition to its riparian rights in the river. On January 8, 1906, the Land Company, by grant deed, conveyed to the Empire Water Company, hereinafter called the Water Company, certain described ditches and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stratton v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Fulton v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stratford Irrigation District v. Empire Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Stratford Irrigation District v. Empire Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Empire West Side Irrigation District v. Stratford Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API