Stratford Irrigation District v. Empire Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and appellant brought this action in condemnation. Defendants and respondents demurred generally and specially to the complaint. Their demurrers, identical in form, were sustained. Plaintiff failed to amend. Judgment was entered for defendants. From this judgment plaintiff appealed.
The complaint alleges generally that the plaintiff is an irrigation district and that it brings the action on behalf of the landowners within its boundaries; alleges the corporate existence of the two defendants; describes the location and boundaries of the district; alleges that the defendant Empire…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NahabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.