Stratford Irrigation District v. Empire Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment condemning certain property of the Empire Water Company for the sum of $35,000, approximately $20,000 of which was ordered paid to the Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles, and the balance to the Empire Water Company. We will refer to the Stratford Irrigation District as the district; to the Empire Water Company as the company, and to the Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles as the bank.
The district is an irrigation district organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. Its boundaries include the land to which water was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Joint Highway District No. 9 v. Ocean Shore RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Redwood Baseline, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Alhambra Redevelopment Agency v. Transamerica Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- City of Clearlake v. Highlands Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Mendocino Railway v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026