Legal Opinion

Carney v. Simmonds

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1957No. S. F. 19375PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

J. In this case plaintiff commenced an action which she entitled one for the partition of real property against defendants. Defendants’ demurrer was overruled and plaintiff filed an amended complaint. No demurrer was filed to the amended complaint; it was answered, defendants claiming among other things that it did not state a cause of action. When it came on for trial defendants moved for a “judgment on the pleadings” on the ground that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action in that it purported to attack a decree assigning the entire estate to a widow on the ground of…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API