Fulton v. Jansen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Couuty, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action was brought by the respondent to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey certain real property situate in the county of Los Angeles. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order refusing a new trial defendants appeal. »
The findings of the court show, in substance, that on the *589thirteenth day pf October, 1889, one Jason Brown was the owner of the land in dispute, and certain other land of which it was an undivided part; that said Brown, in the presence of defendants and upon the land, pointed out to plaintiff certain boundaries defining the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Osborne v. EndicottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Bayles v. BaxterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Faylor v. FaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.