Legal Opinion

Hauskins v. McGillicuddy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 91-397PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

This case is an appeal from a summary judgment holding that an attorney’s failure to timely file a claim against the State constituted “excusable neglect,” as a matter of law, for purposes of Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821 (authorization of claim against public entity or public employee). Because we hold that the issue of what constitutes attorney “excusable neglect” for purposes of A.R.S. section 12-281 is a question of fact for a jury, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API