Hauskins v. McGillicuddy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Presiding Judge.
This case is an appeal from a summary judgment holding that an attorney’s failure to timely file a claim against the State constituted “excusable neglect,” as a matter of law, for purposes of Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821 (authorization of claim against public entity or public employee). Because we hold that the issue of what constitutes attorney “excusable neglect” for purposes of A.R.S. section 12-281 is a question of fact for a jury, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.