Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
*34OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal relates to the obligation of the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (“District”) to indemnify owners of the Gillespie Dam (“Dam Owners”) for a settlement the Dam Owners entered into with farmers injured by a 1993 breach of the Dam (“Farmers”). We hold, inter alia, that: (1) An agreement by which the District agreed to indemnify the Dam Owners against “all liability” covers all liability, including liability subject to a covenant not to execute between the Dam Owners and the Farmers; (2) The Dam Owners’ indemnity claim was not barred by Arizona’s…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Wade v. Emcasco InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Marisol Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Encon Arizona LLC v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Gunderson v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.