Legal Opinion

Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. Marvin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1957No. 6246PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBBONS, Superior Court Judge.

The assignments of error, briefly stated, are that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant defendant’s application for a continuance of the hearing on a motion to vacate the default of defendant and set aside default judgment and in denying the motion to vacate.

Appellee O. F. Marvin, d.b.a. Mardun Electric Company, as plaintiff, brought an .action in the superior court seeking judgment in excess of $4,000 for labor and materials furnished to defendant-appellant, Coconino Pulp and Paper Company. Process was regularly issued and service made on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Lynch v. Arizona Enterprise Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bowman v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Collister v. Inter-State Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API