Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Geyler
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1985No. 17615-PRPublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
Defendants, Richard and Bernice Geyler, petitioned us to review a decision of the court of appeals (City of Phoenix v. Geyler, No. 1 CA-CIV 6402, filed May 22, 1984). The memorandum decision affirmed the trial court’s order denying defendants’ motion for relief from judgment brought pursuant to Rule 60(c), Ariz.R.Civ.P., 16 A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S.
The issues are as follows:
1. What are the standards upon which to determine whether relief from a civil judgment should be granted in order…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.