Legal Opinion

Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 30, 1999No. 2 CA-CV 98-0218PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants HealthPartners of Southern Arizona, doing business as Tucson Medical Center (TMC), and Lalitha Ramanna, M.D., raise three issues in their appeal from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of appellees James and Theresa Monaco. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motions for summary judgment, for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and for a new trial or remittitur. Because we find no error in the trial court’s rulings, we affirm.

¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Keck v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Harris v. Maricopa County Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API