Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 In a prior lawsuit, Peter and Tanya Strojnik sued the law firm of Diouguardi, Poli and Ball (the “Poli Firm”) for malicious prosecution. The Poli Firm’s insurer, General Insurance Company of America (“GICA”), contested coverage and therefore defended the firm under a reservation of rights. After the Strojniks and the Poli Firm negotiated the terms of a Morns agreement, 1 GICA and the firm resolved the coverage dispute, and, as a result, the Poli Firm refused to enter the Morris agreement.
¶ 2 The Strojniks then sued GICA for intentional interference with their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Kuehn v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.