Wineman v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs were employed as live-in caretakers of property that the defendant operated as a hunting and fishing club. After their employment was terminated, they filed this action claiming that the defendant did not pay premium overtime wages required by law and also failed to pay other benefits according to their employment agreement. The defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment al leging that some or all of the plaintiffs’ claims based on state contract law and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fannie Ball (02-6289) Stephen Heiser (02-6311) v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grosso v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Boaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Ayers v. Enviro-Clean Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Thomas v. Candid Care Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022