Legal Opinion
Grosso v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 19, 2006No. Civil Action 05-6128PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Max Grosso filed this action against his employer, Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), alleging retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a) (2); interference with his rights under the FMLA, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1); and retaliation under Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Program (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. Presently before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kimes v. University of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pfeifer v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- PSC Info Group v. Lason, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Alred v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Bullard v. FedEx Freight, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.