Legal Opinion
Fannie Ball (02-6289) Stephen Heiser (02-6311) v. Union Carbide Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 30, 2004No. 02-6289, 02-6311PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
This is a consolidated case. The Heiser Plaintiffs are individuals who live or have lived in or near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and who allegedly have cancer or have an increased risk of acquiring cancer or other diseases. The Ball Plaintiffs are African-Americans who live or have lived in a community known as Scarboro in Oak Ridge. Plaintiffs claim that they have been harmed through exposure to radioactive and other toxic substances over the period when nuclear weapons were manufactured in Oak Ridge. Defendants are private contractors of the United States government…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Beattie v. CenturyTel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- CenTra, Inc. v. EstrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Cardinal v. MetrishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.