Legal Opinion
Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 23, 1945No. Nos. 445, 554, 421PublishedCited by 1,258 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
The writs of certiorari granted in these three cases present questions as to the interpretation of Section 16 (b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, at 1069, which provides that an employer who violates the minimum wage and maximum hour provisions of the Act “ . . . shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be, and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages. ...” Cases No. 445 and No. 554 raise the question whether an employee subject to the terms of…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,258 opinions
- Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fisher v. SD Protection Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
1,253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.