Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pokorny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 30, 1990No. C9-89-719PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent missed three court hearings in two separate matters, issued an insufficient fund check to opposing counsel in payment of court-awarded fees, and failed to pay two judgments for law-related debts. Respondent’s prior private disciplines aggravated this misconduct. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) and the referee recommended respondent be publicly reprimanded, placed on two years supervised probation, and required to successfully complete the professional responsibility exam and pay the remaining unpaid judgment against him. While we…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Matter of Discipline of GubbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Application of GahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API