Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Moore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 2005No. A04-215PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent Yvonne B. Moore, a licensed Minnesota attorney since 1963, practices primarily in the area of family law. This attorney discipline case arose from a February 10, 2004, petition filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility alleging that Moore violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1 (competence), 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication), and 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) 1 when she did not attend a hearing she scheduled for a client, failed to inform the court she would not attend, did not attempt to obtain a continuance,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PokornySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against EdingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.