Legal Opinion
Mongillo v. Mongillo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 30, 2002No. AC 20975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this appeal from a marital dissolution judgment, the plaintiff, Beth Ann Mongillo, claims that the trial court acted improperly (1) in its determination that the marriage was no longer viable after seven years, (2) in its award of alimony for a period of one year and (3) in its failure to award her any portion of the vested pension benefits of the defendant, Edward Mongillo. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record discloses the following relevant information. The parties, who were married on April 10, 1987, had one child, who was bom in May, 1992. At the time *474o…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Divito v. DivitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Calo-Turner v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Greco v. GrecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hammick v. HammickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.