Legal Opinion
Bender v. Bender
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 18, 2001No. SC 16434PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether, in a dissolution action, unvested pension benefits are property subject to equitable distribution pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-81.1 Following our grant of certification to appeal, the defendant *736appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court. The trial court had ordered, among other things, that the plaintiff, Sharon Bender, would be entitled, in the event that the pension of the defendant, Mark Bender, ultimately vested, to one half of the pension benefits earned by him…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.