Legal Opinion
Krafick v. Krafick
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 8, 1995No. 15043PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issues in this certified appeal are whether vested pension benefits constitute property for the purposes of equitable distribution pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-81,1 and, if so, what methods are appropriate by which to value such benefits. The plaintiff, Patricia A. Krafick, appealed to the Appellate Court from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her thirty-three year marriage to the defendant, John H. Krafick, and distributing the parties’ marital assets. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court without opinion. Krafick v. Krafick, 34 Conn. App.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Diffenderfer v. DiffenderferSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Cohen v. CohenTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.