Legal Opinion
Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 24, 1999No. SC 16011PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*337 Opinion
BERDON, J.
In this appeal, the defendant Allen-Bradley Company, LLC,1 claims that the trial court improperly found that, under the Connecticut Franchise Act (franchise act), General Statutes §§ 42-133e through 42-133h: (1) a franchise relationship existed between the defendant manufacturer and the plaintiff distributor, the Hartford Electric Supply Company;2 and (2) the defendant did not have “good cause” to terminate the franchise relationship.3 The defendant also argues that the trial court improperly found that the defendant violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Thomas McKee v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Grand Light & Supply Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Honeywell, Inc., Micro Switch, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.