Legal Opinion
State v. Santiago
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 2002No. AC 20812PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The defendant, Daniel Santiago, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-55 (a) (1) and 53a-55a (a),1 and assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (l).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly permitted the prosecutor to engage in misconduct during cross-examination of the defendant and in closing argument, which deprived the defendant of a fair trial, (2) incorrectly found certain essential facts…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. GentileConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SamuelsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.